Now Available on Amazon Constitutional Sound Bites

The Sixth Amendment, One Amendment, Six Constitutional Rights

Sixth AmendmentThe Sixth Amendment contains rights beyond the well-known right to an attorney in criminal matters. There are six constitutional rights in the Sixth Amendment.  They are procedural rights designed to protect an individual’s inalienable natural rights of life and liberty.

The Sixth Amendment is part of the Bill of Rights, passed by the First Congress in 1789, completing a promise of the proponents of the Constitution regarding limits on the Federal government to be added once the Constitution was ratified. The Bill of Rights was ratified in 1791.

The Sixth Amendment

The Sixth Amendment reads:

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district where in the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

A summary of Sixth Amendment rights:

Originally these rights were only guaranteed to persons charged with federal crimes.  The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment has extended these rights to cover state criminal proceedings.

Speedy Trial

The right to a speedy trial has been defined by statute in most jurisdictions, placing time limitations during which a criminal trial must take place, or else the charges must be dismissed.

Time calculations are often complicated. A defendant may waive his speedy trial rights, or may waive it in stages. If the defendant delays a trial, the time that passes does not count against the time defined by speedy trial statutes. There is a four part test to determine if speedy trial rights have been violated:

  • Length of Delay: A delay of a year or more from the date on which the speedy trial right “attaches” (the date of arrest or indictment, whichever first occurs) was termed “presumptively prejudicial
  • Reason for the delay: The government may not delay a trial for its own benefit, but a trial may be delayed for the testimony of an absent witness or other practical reasons.
  • Time and manner in which the defendant has asserted his right: If a defendant agrees to a delay or causes it himself when the delay is beneficial to the defendant, he cannot later claim violation of his speedy trial right.
  • Degree of prejudice to the defendant by the delay.

Public Trial

The public trial right is not absolute. The prosecution or defense may request a closed trial. The right to a public trial must be balanced against the right to a fair trial. If the court finds a public trial will interfere with the trial’s fairness, the proceedings may be closed. These are rare circumstances.

Impartial Jury

The jury trial right depends upon the offense charged. Charges with a potential penalty of less than six months in jail, carry no right. The place of the trial and the jurors are to be selected from the area where the crime was committed.[1]

An impartial jury consists of unbiased individuals, and the jury selection process of voir dire, allows the prosecution and defense to question potential jurors in an effort to discover juror bias. An attorney may challenge a juror’s service for bias, and if the judge agrees that juror will not be on the jury. Voir dire is a complex process designed to select a jury that does not favor either side.

Notice of Accusation

After bond has been set, typically the first formal court proceeding after an arrest is an arraignment. At arraignment the defendant is told of the charges in the indictment. The indictment must allege all elements of the crime with such precision that the defendant would be able to avoid double jeopardy if he were to be prosecuted at a later date for the same actions.

Confrontation and Subpoena of Witnesses

This provision is commonly known as the “confrontation clause”. The defendant’s right to question witnesses against him grows out of the rule against hearsay. Hearsay is a statement made out of court about a fact relevant to the case by someone other than the person testifying. Since the defense cannot challenge the credibility of the person not in court, hearsay cannot be used in court.

A defendant can have the court order witnesses to appear for the defense.  A court will issue a subpoena for defense witnesses upon request.[2]

Counsel or Attorney

The courts have ruled that a defendant has the right to an attorney once judicial proceedings have begun against him. The extent to which this right is in effect has been expanded over time.  A critical case in expanding the right to counsel was Gideon v. Wainwright in which an indigent man wrote the Supreme Court from a Florida prison about how he was convicted without counsel. That case extended the right to counsel to state courts, resulting in the system of Public Defenders throughout the country.

The right to counsel has also been incorporated into the well-known Miranda warnings along with the Fifth Amendment‘s right to remain silent.

Natural Law Rights and Positive Law Rights

Sixth Amendment rights are positive[3] law rights, created to protect the natural law rights of life and liberty[4].  If the government is attempting to punish someone by taking away their liberty[5] Sixth Amendment procedures must be followed for the actions of the government to be legal.[6]


[1] A defendant may request a “change of venue” if there is evidence that he would be unable to get a fair trial in the place where the crime took place.

[2] The court may require the defense to show the witnesses are relevant to the case before issuing the subpoena.

[3] There is the common law, which is the accumulation of judicial opinions.  Positive law has been written by a legislature as a statute or ratified as part of a constitution.

[4] The right to benefit from the fruits of one’s labor is a natural right as well.  If, as punishment for a crime, the government seeks to impose a fine, the government is moving to seize a person’s property.  Sixth Amendment procedures exist to protect an accused property rights as well.

[5] Or in the case of a capital offense, execute him and take away his life.

[6] The duty of defense counsel is to be certain that the government follows the law.

Comments

Trackbacks

  1. […] protections for those the government accuses of having committed a crime.  Among them is the Sixth Amendment right to a “public trial”.  The provision is […]

  2. […] The abuses of the English trial system in presenting evidence in criminal trials that a defendant could not challenge and Raleigh’s story in particular were well known to the Founders of America.  One protection against such abuses is the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment: […]

  3. […] It certainly seems obvious and fair that when the government charges someone with a crime that the person be told what law he has violated and what he did to violate that law.  That a government does not always conduct itself in a fair manner and that it needs to be reminded of the obvious is found in this provision of the Constitution’s Sixth Amendment: […]

  4. […] The abuses of the English trial system in presenting evidence in criminal trials that a defendant could not challenge and Raleigh’s story in particular were well known to the Founders of America.  One protection against such abuses is the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment: […]

  5. […] The Sixth Amendment, One Amendment, Six Constitutional Rights […]

  6. […] The Sixth Amendment, One Amendment, Six Constitutional Rights […]